In 1872 the Christ Church College Cathedral belfry showed damages which made it necessary to rehouse its bells elsewhere. Driven by Dean Henry George Liddel, the New Belfry project started in 1872. The new bell tower was to be placed at the top right corner of Tom Quad, above the staircase to the dining hall. Alas, money run out and a very simple big wooden cube served as the new temporary belfry. It was so simple that C.L. Dodgson associated it with, among other shapes, a new design pattern for bonnet-boxes and bathing-machines (MG025). Later that economy belfry shyly went into hiding behind the walls we can see today (right image, built from 1876 to 1879).
The new temporary belfry was simple, but inspiring:
[The New Belfry of Christ Church, Oxford] is of the best of Dodgson’s Oxford squibs, a good humored but cutting attack on Dean Liddell (the father of Alice) and the wooden cube built to contain the Cathedral bells during operations to build a new tower. Though it can still be found today behind the stone walls of the tower, the wooden cube was always a temporary plan but Dodgson was impatient and the Governing body were slow.
Source: Cristies, 2009-12-04
An exerpt from Dodgson’s Oxford squib The New Belfry of Christ Church where “Bathing-machines” are mentioned:
§ 7. On the impetus given to Art in England by the new Belfry, Ch. Ch.
The idea has spread far and wide, and is rapidly pervading all branches of manufacture. Already an enterprising maker of bonnet-boxes is advertising ‘the Belfry pattern’: two builders of bathing-machines at Ramsgate have followed his example: one of the great London houses is supplying ‘bar-soap’ cut in the same striking and symmetrical form: and we are credibly informed that Borwick’s Baking Powder and Thorley’s Food for Cattle are now sold in no other shape.
The Snark was fond of bathing-machines:
161 “The fourth is its fondness for bathing-machines,
162 Which it constantly carries about,
163 And believes that they add to the beauty of scenes—
164 A sentiment open to doubt.
More about a simple design, accompanied just by bell tingeling:
101 “Other maps are such shapes, with their islands and capes!
102 But we’ve got our brave Captain to thank:
103 (So the crew would protest) “that he’s bought us the best—
104 A perfect and absolute blank!”
105 This was charming, no doubt; but they shortly found out
106 That the Captain they trusted so well
107 Had only one notion for crossing the ocean,
108 And that was to tingle his bell
There are suggestions that the Bell in The Hunting of the Snark might be interpreted as a symbol for time and time pressure. I think that it also might have been used by C.L. Dodgson to continue lampooning Dean Henry Liddell‘s belfry project.
In his annotation MG047 to the preservation of the “symmetrical shape” of a boiled Jubjub, Martin Gardener did not consider that it might be a reference to the “symmetrical form” in § 7 of The New Belfry of Christ Church.
See also: Running Out Of Place: The Language and Architecture of Lewis Carroll (2005) by Caroline Dionne.
More on the belfry and bathing-machines:
※ The Vision of the Three T’s, chapter III
I think that Carroll/Dodgson tried to fight against apodictic assertiveness and oversimplification not only using nonsense but also mathematics. He expected decisions to have a solid base – like fair voting:
One small part of Dodgson’s work, though, has impressed social scientists: his analysis of the mathematics of voting. His interest in the topic was sparked by the deliberations of his colleagues at Christ Church over such matters as how to choose a new belfry. Dodgson’s pamphlets on voting were largely ignored until 1958, when a British economist, Duncan Black, noticed that there had been nothing so good on the topic since just after the French Revolution.
Ostensibly, [Dodgson] was pondering the best way for the governing body of Christ Church, Oxford, where he was a tutor in mathematics, to decide on the design for a controversial belfry, and to pick new members of the college. […] For college elections, Dodgson first proposed a version of Borda’s method, and also a version of Condorcet’s (though he appears not to have known about Borda’s and Condorcet’s work). Later, he developed an interest in politics beyond the walls of Christ Church, and, in the eighteen-eighties, he tried to find ways to secure equitable representation in Parliament for minorities.
Dodgson’s method of taking votes on more than two issues (1876) attempts to find winners in case initially there is no winner. The method was applied at Christ Church college for a small number of candidates. However, for large lists of choices, the rearranging of candidates (until a winner is found) requires a computing power which surely was not available then. And even today it is a challenge (see McCabe-Dansted below).
- Borda count
- Condorcet method, Condorcet winner
- A Mathematical Approach to Proportional Representation: Duncan Black on Lewis Carroll by Iain McLean (Editor), Duncan Black, Alistair McMillan (Editor), 1996
- Gaming the Vote: Why Elections Aren’t Fair (and What We Can Do About It) by William Poundstone, 2008
- Numbers Rule: The Vexing Mathematics of Democracy, from Plato to the Present by George G.Szpiro, 2010
- The eccentric genius of Lewis Carroll by Ian McLean, 2013
- Approximability and Computational Feasibility of Dodgson’s Rule (2006) by John C. McCabe-Dansted
- Democratix – Examples – Dodgson
- Search: “Dodgson”+”Borda”+”Condorcet”+”belfry”: DuckDuckGo | Google
2018-05-13, correction (1872, not 1972): 2018-12-04, update: 2019-06-08